Change, Creation, and Evolution: Is the Universe Just Moving, or Also Meaningful?

 

Change, Creation, and Evolution: Is the Universe Just Moving, or Also Meaningful?

There is a lot of noise around the question:
“Do you believe in evolution or in creation?”
It sounds like you must pick a team:
  • Team Evolution: “Everything is random change and natural selection. No creator needed.”
  • Team Creation: “God made everything exactly as it is. Evolution is a lie.”
I believe this whole fight is badly framed.

See the bigger picture

Quote by Dr. Cifford Illis:
"Awareness is a must for scientists and thinkers alike".
Before you choose a team, you have to step back and look at some simple, undeniable facts about the world we actually live in.
Let’s start there.

1. Fact one: change is a constant

Look anywhere, at any scale:
Nothing in the universe we can see is truly still.
Everything is in motion.
This is not a theory.
It’s a direct observation.

2. Fact two: adaptation is normal, necessary biology

In the living world, change has a specific flavour: adaptation.
Plants, animals, bacteria — if they cannot adjust to their environments, they die out:
Adaptation is not an exotic miracle.
It is the ordinary, daily business of staying alive.
Biology as a science spends a lot of time describing and explaining these adaptations:
  • How they arise
  • How they spread through populations
  • How they sometimes fail
So we can say very simply:
Change is constant.
For living things, change often takes the form of adaptation.
Without adaptation, life would not survive.
Up to this point, almost everyone can agree.

3. Where “evolution” comes in — and where it doesn’t

Now we bring in the word that starts fights: evolution.
In science, “evolution” usually means:
Changes in the genetic make-up of populations over generations,
driven by mechanisms like mutation, natural selection, genetic drift, and gene flow.
In plain language:
  • Over long periods, small changes add up.
  • Helpful traits tend to spread because the organisms with them survive and reproduce more.
  • Populations can become very different from their ancestors.
You don’t have to like the word “evolution” to see that some such process is happening. We see:
Evolution, in that strict sense, is a framework for explaining how adaptation builds up over time.
But here is the key point:
The fact that adaptation and long-term change happen does not by itself answer the deeper question of where the universe and life came from, or whether there is any purpose behind it.
Evolution, as a biological theory, mainly tells us how living forms change.
It does not, on its own, settle why there is a universe for them to change in at all.

4. The universe in motion: a bigger frame than “evolution vs. creation”

So let’s pull the camera back.
Before we shout “evolution” or “creation,” look at the bigger fact:
The universe itself is always in motion.
Biological evolution, if you accept it, is one special case of a far larger pattern:
Everything changes. Nothing stays fixed.
From this angle, adaptation in biology becomes:
  • Not a strange exception,
  • But a normal expression of a universe where motion and change are the rule, not the accident.
That leads to your central question:
Are change and adaptation proof that “evolution explains everything and there is no creation”?
Or are they simply what a living, moving universe looks like — whether or not that universe was created?

5. What evolution can’t tell you (and what some people pretend it does)

Some people use “evolution” as a magic hammer:
  • They see adaptation and long‑term change.
  • They say, “Evolution did it.”
  • Then they quietly add, “…and therefore there is no creator, no deeper meaning, no purpose.”
But that leap goes far beyond what the science itself can say.
Biology can describe:
  • How traits spread through populations.
  • How complex structures might arise step by step.
  • How life can adapt to many environments.
Biology cannot finally answer:
  • Why there is something rather than nothing.
  • Why the universe has the particular laws it does.
  • Whether those laws were set up by a mind, a will, a deeper intelligence, or whether they are just brute facts.
You can choose to believe that:
  • The universe is just a cold machine with no purpose:
    matter + energy + chance + necessity.
You can also choose to believe:
  • The universe is the expression of a creative source:
    a creator, a living intelligence, or a deeper consciousness that wanted a world that moves, changes, and discovers itself.
In both cases, change and adaptation still happen.
Evolution as a biological theory describes a pattern inside this larger reality.
It does not own the entire story of existence.

💡 FACT (neutral): Evolutionary theory is extremely strong as an explanation of how biological diversity and adaptation arise over time. But leading scientists and philosophers of science agree: it does not, by itself, answer metaphysical questions about ultimate origins or purpose.

6. Where “creation” can live in a changing universe

Many people imagine “creation” like this:
  • A divine engineer makes a finished, static product.
  • Everything appears exactly as it is today, in one moment.
  • Change is almost an enemy of this picture.
Then, when they see fossils, adaptations, and geological time, they feel forced to choose:
“Either I protect a frozen idea of creation or I surrender completely to evolution.”
But there are other ways to think about creation that fit better with what we actually observe:

1. Creation as starting a living process

In this view:
  • A creator (or creative principle) sets up:
    • The conditions that allow matter to form stars and planets
    • The possibility for life to appear and evolve
    • The deep order that makes complexity possible
So evolution and adaptation are:
Not enemies of creation,
but methods inside a created, dynamic universe.

2. Creation as ongoing unfolding

Many spiritual and indigenous traditions see creation as continuous:
  • The world is not just “made once and left alone.”
  • It is always being made, always in process.
  • New forms, new species, new cultures, and new ideas are still appearing.
In this view:
Evolution is one of the ways ongoing creation expresses itself.
Change and adaptation are natural signs that the universe is alive, not dead.
Anthropologically, this fits what we see in many cultures much better than the stiff Western “all or nothing” argument.

7. So what are these “natural phenomena” we see: evolution, creation, or just motion?

Let’s return to your original thought:
“Change is a constant. Adaptation is a normal in Biology. It is actually necessary for the survival of everything biological. Thus, the question we have to ask is; if these natural phenomenons have anything to do with evolution or are they just normal expressions of the universe in motion.”
My take:
  1. Yes, they are normal expressions of a universe in motion.
    • Even without using the word “evolution,” we can see that:
      • Everything changes.
      • Life must adapt or die.
    • This is simply what it means to exist in a dynamic universe.
  2. Yes, biological evolution is a useful name for one part of that motion.
    • It gives us a framework to study exactly how living things change over time.
    • It does not own the whole story of reality.
  3. No, the existence of change and adaptation does not force us to deny creation.
    • A created universe can still change.
    • A wise creator might design a world that unfolds itself through lawful, adaptive processes.
    • Creation and evolution can be seen as addressing different questions:
      • Evolution: How do living forms change?
      • Creation: Why is there a universe with such forms and such laws at all?
So the more honest, spacious position is:
Change and adaptation are facts.
They are normal expressions of a universe in motion.
Evolution is one theory that describes part of this motion in biology.
Whether this moving universe is “just there” or is the work of a creator is a different question — one that biology alone cannot settle.

8. A better question than “evolution or creation?”

Instead of forcing a choice between two camps, we can ask:
  • Why is the universe structured in such a way that:
    • Matter can organize itself,
    • Life can appear,
    • Life can adapt, and
    • Conscious beings can ask these questions at all?
That question is larger than the word “evolution”
and deeper than a childish picture of “creation vs. science.”
Change is real.
Adaptation is real.
Evolution is one way to describe part of that reality.
Creation, if it exists, is the deepest frame that makes any of it possible.
Between those layers, there is space for serious thinking — and honest humility.

Comments